Гістарычныя ўводзіны ў філасофію навукі  Джон Лоўзі

Гістарычныя ўводзіны ў філасофію навукі

Джон Лоўзі
Выдавец: Беларускі Фонд Сораса
Памер: 328с.
Мінск 1995
97.65 МБ
Etudes sur Leonard de Vinci, 3 vols. (Paris: A. Hermann, 1906-13).
Le Systeme du monde: Hlstoire des doctrine cosmologlques de Platon A Copernic, 5 vols. (Paris: A. Hermann et fils, 1913-17); перавыданне ў 6 тамах (1954).
To Save the Phenomena, trans. E. Doland and C. Maschler, (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969).
Працы пра Дэюана
Arlew, R„ ‘The Duhem Thesis’, Brit. J. Phil. Scl. 35 (1984), 31325.
	and Barker, P. (eds.) ‘Pierre Duhem: Historian and Philosop­her of Science’, Synthese, 83 (1990), 179-453; essays by A. Brenner, A. Goddu, R. Maiocchl, R. S. Westman, et al.
Harding, S. (ed.), Can Theories Be Refuted? Essays on the Duhem-Quine Thesis (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1976); essays by A. Gruenbaum, M. B. Hesse, L. Laudan, etal.
Krips, H., 'Epistemological Holism: Duhem or Quine?’ Stud. Hist. Phil. Scl. 13 (1982), 251-64.
Tuana, N., ‘Quinn on Duhem: An Emendation’, Phil. Scl. 45 (1978), 456-62; rejoinder by P. Quinn, ibid. 463-5.
Vuillemin, J., 'On Duhem's and Quine's Theses’, in L. Hahn (ed.), The Philosophy of W. I/. Quine (la Salle, III.: Open Court, 1986).
Працы Кэмпбела
Foundations of Science, formerly Physics: The Elements (1919) (New York: Dover Publications, 1957).
What Is Science? (1921) (New York: Dover Publications, 1952).
Працы npa Кэмпбела
Hempel, C. G., Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science (New York: Free Press, 1965), 206-10, 442-7.
Hesse, M. B., Models and Analogies in Science (New York: Sheed 4 Ward, 1963).
Schlesinger, G., Method In the Physical Sciences (New York: Humanities Press, 1963), ch. 3, sect. 5.
Працы Хэс
‘An Inductive Logic of Theories', in M. Radner and S. Winokur (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, iv (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1970), 164-80.
‘Analogy and Confirmation Theory', Phil. Scl. 31 (1964), 319-27.
‘Consilience of Inductions’, In I. Lakatos (ed.), The Problem of Inductive Logic (Amsterdam: North Holland, 1968), 232-46, 254-7.
Forces and Fields (London: Nelson, 1961).
‘Is There an Independent Observation Language?', in R. Colodny (ed.), The Nature and Function of Scientific Theories (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1970), 35-77.
Models and Analogies In Science (Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 1966).
•Models in Physics', Brit. J. Phil. Scl. 4 (1953-4), 198-214.
‘Positivism and the Logic of Scientific Theories', in P. Achinstein and
S. Barker (eds.), The Legacy of Logical Positivism (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1969), 65-114.
Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science (Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press, 1980).
Science and the Human Imagination (London: SCM Press, 1954).
The Structure of Scientific Inference (London: Macmillan, 1974).
'Theories, Dictionaries, and Observation’, Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 9 (19589), 12-28.
'What Is the Best Way to Assess Evidential Support for Scientific Theories?', In L. J. Cohen and M. B. Hesse (eds.), Applications of Inductive Logic (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980).
Працы Харэ
The Anticipation of Nature (London: Hutchinson, 1965).
Causal Powers, with E. H. Madden (Oxford: Blackwell, 1975).
'Concepts and Criteria', Mind, 73 (1964), 353-63.
The Explanation of Social Behaviour, with Paul Secord (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1972).
An Introduction to the Logic of the Sciences (London: Macmillan, 1967).
Matter and Method (London: Macmillan, 1964).
Philosophies of Science (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972).
'Powers', Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 21 (1970), 81-101.
The Principles of Scientific Thinking (London: Macmillan, 1970).
Theories and Things (London: Newman History and Philosophy of Science Series, 1961).
Varieties of Realism (Oxford: Blackwell, 1986).
Працы npa Xaps
Bhaskar, R. (ed.), Наггб and His Critics (Cambridge: Blackwell, 1990).
Frankel, H., ‘Harrrf on Causation', Phil. Sci. 43 (1976), 560-9.
Wilson, F., 'Dispositions Defined: Harr^and Madden on Analysing Disposition Concepts’, Phil. Sci. 52(1985), 591-607.
10.	ІНДУКТЫВІЗМ СУПРАЦЬ ГІПАТЭТЫЧНАДЭДУКЦЫЙНАГА ПОГЛЯДУ HA НАВУКУ
Працы Міля
A System of Logic: Ratiocinative and Inductive, 6th edn. (London: Longmans, Green, 1865).
Works, ed. F. E. L. Priestley, J. M. Robinson, et al. (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1963 ).
Працы npa Міля
Anschutz, R. P., The Philosophy of J. S. Mill (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1953).
Bradley, F. H., Principles of Logic, 2nd edn. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1928); y Раздзеле 3 другой часткі другога тома прыводзіцца аналіз паглядаў Міля на Індукцыю.
Ducasse, С. J., 'John Stuart Mill's System of Logic', in R. M. Blake, C. J. Ducasse, and E. H. Madden, Theories of Scientific Method: The Renaissance through the Nineteenth Century (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1960), 218-32.
Jacobs, S., 'John Stuart Mill on Induction and Hypothesis’, J. Hist. Phil. 29 (1991), 69-83.
Jevons, W. S., 'John Stuart Mill's Philosophy Tested', pt. 2 of Pure Logic and Other Minor Works (London: Macmillan, 1890).
Laine, M., Bibliography of Works on John Stuart Mill (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1982); падборка з вяліхай колькасцю сціслых анатацыяў.
Losee, J., 'Whewell and Mill on the Relation Between Philosophy of Science and History of Science', Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci. 14(1983), 11321.
Ryan, A., The Philosophy of John Stuart Mill (London: Macmillan, 1970).
Skorupski, J., John Stuart Mill (London: Routledge, 1989).
Працы Джэванса
The Principles of Science (1877) (New York: Dover Publications, 1958).
11.	МАТЭМАТЫЧНЫ ПАЗІТЫВІЗМ
I КАНВЕНЦЫЯНАЛІЗМ
Працы Берклі
The Works of George Berkeley, Bishop of Cloyne, 9 vols., ed. A. A. Luce and T. E. Jessop (London: Thomas Nelson & Sons, 194857).
Працы npa Берклі
Asher, W., ‘Berkeley on Absolute Motion’, H. Phil. Quart. 4 (1987), 447-66.
Atherton, M., 'Corpuscles, Mechanism and Essentialism in Berkley and Locke’, J. Hist. Phil. 29 (1991), 47-67.
Myhill, J., 'Berkeley’s De Motu An Anticipation of Mach’, in George Berkeley: Lectures Delivered Before the Philosophical Union of the University of California (Berkeley, Calif.: University of Califor­nia Press, 1957), 141-57.
Newton-Smith, W.H., 'Berkeley’s Philosophy of Science’, In J. Foster and H. Robinson (eds.), Essays on Berkeley: A Tercenten­nial Celebration (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985).
Pitcher, G., Berkeley (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1977).
Popper, K. R., 'А Note on Berkley as Precursor of Mach', Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 4 (1953-4), 26-36.
Sosa, E. (ed.), Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1987).
Urmson, J. O., Berkeley (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982).
Whitrow, G. J., 'Berkeley's Philosophy of Motion’, Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 4(1953-4), 37-45.
Winkler, К., 'Berkeley on Volition, Power, and the Complexity of Causation', H. Phil. Quart. 2 (1985), 53-69.
Працы Maxa
The Analysis of Sensations (1886), trans. C. M. Williams (New York: Dover Publications, 1959).
History and Root of the Principle of the Conservation of Energy (1872), trans. P. E. Jourdain (Chicago: Open Court Publishing Co., 1910).
Popular Scientific Lectures (1896), trans. T. J. McCormack (Chica­go: Open Court Publishing Company, 1943).
The Science of Mechanics (1883), trans. T. J. McCormack (La Salle, III.: Open Court Publishing Co., 1960).
Space and Geometry (1901 -3), trans. T. J. McCormack (Chicago: Open Court Publishing Co., 1906).
Працы npa Maxa
Alexander, P., 'The Philosophy of Science, 1850-1910', In D. J. O’Connor (ed.), A Critical History of Western Philosophy (New York: Free Press, 1964), 403-9.
Bradley, J., Mach's Philosophy of Science (London: Athlone Press, 1971).
Bunge, M., 'Mach’s Critique of Newtonian Mechanics’, Am. J. Phys. 34(1966), 585-96.
Cohen, R. S., and Seeger, R. J. (ed.), 'Ernst Mach, Physicist and Philosopher’, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vi (New York: Humanities Press, 1970); змяшчае бібліяграфію твораў Maxa I аб Maxy.
Feyerabend, P., 'Mach’s Theory of Research and Its Relation to Einstein', Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci. 15 (1984), 1-22.
Frank, P., Modern Science and Its Philosophy (New York: George Braziller, 1961), 13-62, 69-95.
Loparic', Z., 'Problem-Solving and Theory Structure in Mach’, Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci. 15 (1984), 23-49.
Працы Пуанкарэ
Mathematics and Science: Last Essays, Eng. trans. J. W. Bolduc of Dernieres pens^es (1913) (New York: Dover Publications, 1963).
Science and Hypothesis (1902), trans. G. B. Halsted (New York: Science Press, 1905).
Science and Method (1909), trans. F. Maitland (New York: Dover Publications, 1952).
The Value of Science (1905), trans. G. 8. Halsted (New York: Science Press, 1907).
Працы npa Пуанхарэ
Alexander, P., 'The Philosophy of Science, 1850-1910’, in D. J. O'Connor (ed.), A Critical History of Western Philosophy (New York: Free Press, 413-17).
Krips, H., 'Atomism, Poincare'and Planck’, Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci. 17 (1986), 43-63.
Stump, D., 'Henri Polncard’s Philosophy of Science', Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci. 20 (1989), 335-63.
Працы Попера
Conjectures and Refutations (New York: Basic Books, 1963).
'The Demarcation Between Science and Metaphysics’, in P. A. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, (LaSalle, III.: Open Court, 1963), 183-226.
'Indeterminism in Quantum Physics and Classical Physics’, Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 1 (1950-1), 117-33, 173-95.
The Logic of Scientific Discovery (New York: Basic Books, 1959); 1st edn., Logik der Forschung (1934).
’The Nature of Philosophical Problems and Their Roots In Science’, Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 3 (1952-3), 124-56.
‘A Note on Natural Laws and So-Called ‘Contrary-to-Fact Conditi­onals”, Mind, 58 (1949), 62-6.
Objective Knowledge (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972).
The Open Society and Its Enemies, 2 vols., 4th edn., rev. (New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1963).
'Philosophy of Science: A Personal Report’, in C. A. Mace (ed.), British Philosophy In the Mid-Century (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1957), 155-91.
‘A Proof of the Impossibility of Inductive Probability', with D. Miller, Nature, 302 (1983), 687-8.