КНІГІ ОНЛАЙН
Пошук сярод кніг, што прайшлі індэксацыю гуглам. Некаторыя кнігі гугл не знаходзіць
'The Propensity Interpretation of Probability’, Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 10 (1959-60), 25-42. The Self and Its Brain, with J. Eccles (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1983). Працы npa Попера Ackermann, R. J., The Philosophy of Karl Popper (Amherst, Mass.: University of Massachusetts Press, 1976). Agassi, J., 'To Save Verisimilitude’, Mind, 90 (1981), 576-9. Bunge, M. A. (ed.), The Critical Approach to Science and Philosophy (Glencoe, III.: Free Press, 1964); зборнік артыкулаў з бібліяграфіяй выданняў Попера. Chihara, С. S., and Gillies, D. A., 'An Interchange on the PopperMiller Argument', Phil. Stud. 54 (1988), 1-8. Derksen, A. A., 'The Alleged Unity of Popper's Philosophy of Science: Falsifiability as Fake Cement', Phil. Stud. 48 (1985), 313-36. Fain, H., 'Reviewof The Logic of Scientific Discovery', Phil. Sci. 28 (1961), 319-24. Newton-Smith, W. H., The Rationality of Science (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981), ch. 3. Nola, R., 'The Status of Popper's Theory of Scientific Method', Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 38 (1987), 441-80. O’Hear, A., Karl Popper (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1980). Salmon, W., ‘Rational Prediction', Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 32(1981), IIS25. Sarkar, H., A Theory of Method (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1983), ch. 2. Schlipp, P. A. (ed.), The Philosophy of Karl R. Popper, 2 vols. (La Salle, III.: Open Court Publishing Co., 1974); змяшчае "інтэлектуальную аўтабіяграфію" Попера, вялікую колькасць артыкулаў аб філасофіі Попера, а таксама бібліяграфію яго твораў, складзеную Т. Э. Хансэнам. 12. ЛОГІКА-РЭКАНСТРУКЦЫЯНІСЦКАЯ ФІЛАСОФІЯ НАВУКІ Творы, напісаныя ў логіка-рзканструкцыянісцкай традыцыі Braithwaite, R. В„ Scientific Explanation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1953). Bridgman, P. W., The Logic of Modern Physics (New York: Macmillan, 1927). The Nature of Physical Theory (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1936). Reflections of a Physicist (New York: Philosophical Library, 1950). The Way Things Are (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1959). Brodbeck, M. (ed.), Readings In the Philosophy of the Social Sciences (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1968). Carnap, R., ‘The Methodological Character of Theoretical Concepts', In H. Feigl and M. Scriven (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, I (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1956), 38-76. Logical Foundations of Probability, 2nd. edn. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962). Philosophical Foundations of Physics, ed. M. Gardner (New York: Basic Books, 1966). Danto, A., and Morgenbesser, S. (eds.). Philosophy of Science (New York: Meridian Books, 1960). Feigl, H., and Brodbeck, M. (eds.), Readings In the Philosophy of Science (New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1953). Frank, P., Philosophy of Science (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: PrenticeHall, 1957). Hempel, C., Aspects of Scientific Explanation (New York: Free Press, 1965). Philosophy of Natural Science (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1966). Hempel C., 'Rudolf Carnap: Logical Empiricist’, Synthese, 46(1973), 256-68. 'Turns in the Evolution of the Problem of Induction’, Synthese, 46 (1981), 389-404. Hutton, E., The Language of Modern Physics (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1956). Nagel, E., The Structure of Science (New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1961). -— 'Theory and Observation', in E. Nagel, S. Bromberger and A. Grunbaum, Observation and Theory in Science, ed. M. Mandelbaum (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1971), 15-43. Neurath, O., Carnap, R., and Morris, C. (eds.), Foundations of the Unity of Science, 2 vols. (formerly, International Encyclopedia of the United Science, 1938-69) (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969, 1970); змяшчае манаграфіі P. Карнапа, Ф. Франка, К. Гемпеля ды іншых. Pap, A., An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science (Glencoe, III.: Free Press, 1962). Rescher, N., Scientific Explanation (New York: Free Press, 1970). Smart, J. J. C., Between Science and Philosophy (New York: Random House, 1968). Philosophy and Scientific Realism (London: Routledge &Kegan Paul, 1963). Працы npa традыцыю лагічнага рэканструкцыянізму Brown, H. I., Perception, Theory and Commitment (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977). Feigl, H., 'Some Major Issues and Developments in the Philosophy of Science of Logical Empiricism', in H. Feigl and M. Scriven (eds.), Minnesota Studies In the Philosophy of Science, i (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1956), 3-37. Oldroyd, D., The Arch of Knowledge (London: Methuen, 1986), ch. 6. Scheffler, I., The Anatomy of Inquiry (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1963). Schlipp, P. (ed.), The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap (La Salle, III: Open Court, 1963); змяшчае 'Інтэлектуальную аўтабіяграфію" Kapнапа, вялікую колькасць артыкулаў па філасофіі Карнапа, а таксама бібліяграфію твораў Карнапа. Suppe, F., ‘The Search for Philosophic Understanding of Scientific Theories’, In Suppe (ed.), The Structure of Scientific Theories (Urbana, III: University of Illinois Press, 1974); змяшчае падрабязную бібліяграфію. 13. НАСТУП НА АРТАДОКСІЮ Achinstein, Р., Concepts of Science (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1968). Feigl, H., 'Existential Hypotheses’, Phil. Sci. 17 (1950), 35-62; Phil. Sci. 17 змяшчае, між Іншага, крытыку працы Файгля з боку К. Гемпеля, 3. Нэйджэла, К. У. Чэрчмана, а таксама адказ на яе самаго Файгля. and Maxwell, G. (eds.), Current Issues in the Philosophy of Science (New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1961). Feyerabend, P., 'Explanation, Reduction and Empiricism', in H. Feigl and G. Maxwell (eds.), Minnesota Studies In the Philosophy of Science, iii (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1962), 28-97. 'Problems of Empiricism’, in R. Colodny (ed.), Beyond the Edge of Certainty (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1965). 'How To Be a Good Empiricist A Plea for Tolerance In Matters Epistemological', in B. Brody (ed.), Readings in the Philosophy of Science (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1970), 319-42. 'Problems of Empiricism Part II’, in R. Colodny (ed.), The Nature and Function of Scientific Theories (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1970), 275-353. Against Method (London: NLB, 1975). Goodman, N., Fact, Fiction and Forecast, 2nd edn. (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1965). Grunbaum, A., 'The Duhemian Argument’, Phil. Sci. 27 (1960), 7587. 'The Falsifiability of Theories: Total or Partial? A Contemporary Evaluation of the Duhem-Quine Thesis', In M. Wartofsky (ed.), Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, I (Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1963), 178-95. 'Temporally Asymmetric Principles, Parity Between Explanation and Prediction, and Mechanism and Teleology’, Phil. Sci. 29 (1962), 146-70. Hanson, N. R., Patterns of Discovery (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958). Maxwell, G., ‘The Ontological Status of the Theoretical Entities’, in H. Felgl and G. Maxwell (eds.), Minnesota Studies In the Philosophy of Science, ill (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1962). Michalos, A., The Popper-Carnap Controversy (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1971). Morick, H. (ed.), Challenges to Empiricism (Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth, 1972). Putnam, H., 'The Analytic and the Synthetic’, In H. Felgl and G. Maxwell (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, iii (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1962), 358-97. 'What Theories Are Not’, in E. Nagel, P. Suppes, and A. Tarski (eds.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1962), 240-51; repr. in Putnam, Mathematics, Matter and Method, Philosophical Papers, i (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975), 215-27. Quine, W., ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism', in From a Logical Point of View (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1953). Schaffner, K. F., ‘Correspondence Rules’, Phil. Sci. 36(1969), 28090. Scriven, M., 'Explanation and Prediction in Evolutionary Theory', Science, 130 (28 Aug. 1959), 447-82. ‘Explanations, Predictions, and Laws’, in H. Feigl and G. Maxwell (eds.), Minnesota Studies In the Philosophy of Science, iii (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1962), 170-230. Sellars, W., ‘The Language of Theories’, in B. Brody (ed.), Readings in the Philosophy of Science, 343-53. Spector, M., ‘Models and Theories’, Br. J. Phil. Sci. 16 (1965-6), 121-42. Toulmin, S., Foresight and Understanding (New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1961). 14. ТЭОРЫІ НАВУКОВАГА ПРАГРЭСУ Dilworth, C., Scientific Progress (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1981). Kordig, G., The Justification of Scientific Change (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1971). Kuhn T. S., The Essential Tension (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970). Lakatos, I., ‘Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes', in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970), 'History of Science and Its Rational Reconstructions’, in Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, viii (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1971), 91-136; гэты tom змяшчае крытыку пазіцыі Лакатуша з боку Т. С. Куна, Г. Файгля, Р. Дж. Хола I Н. Куртгэ, а таксама адказ на яе Лакатуша. and Musgrave, A. (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970); змяшчае крытычныя артыкулы па пазіцыі Куна аўтарства Дж. Уоткінса, С. Тулміна, Л. П. Уільямса, К. Попера, М. Мастэрмана і П. Файерабенда, a таксама адказ Куна. Laudan, L., Progress and Its Problems (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1977). McMullin, E., 'The History and Philosophy of Science: ATaxonomy', in R. Stuewer (ed.), Historical and Philosophical Perspectives of Science (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1970), 12-67. Musgrave, A., 'Kuhn’s Second Thoughts’, Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 22 (1971), 287-97. Scheffler, I., Science and Subjectivity (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1967); крытычны разгляд "суб'ектыўных’ альтэрнатываў артадоксіі.